Clearfil AP-X
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: Class I, II, V restorations of posterior teeth
Claim 2: Class III, IV, V restorations of anterior teeth
Claim 3: Cervical cavities or defects involving root surfaces



 
 
 
 

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0

MAI Sui,uU Hong-yan,WANG Hong.ZHUANG Pei-lin. Clinical evaluation on restoration of permanent molars with interproximal caries. Chin J Geriatr Dent. 2006; 4: 196.

ZHU Lin-hong,GUO Ya-juan.Study on the clinical efects of 3 kinds of materials restored V type cavities of the elderly. Chin J Geriatr Dent 2009; 7: 286.

Claim 3:
Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2010 Mar;38(3):191-200.

Jia Yan. Kuraray AP-XTM resin and Dentsply glass ionomer cement for teeth Comparison of Wedge-shaped Defect Repair of Body Neck. Chin Health Ind 2012; 4: 107.</a>

Qin W, Song Z, Ye YY, Lin ZM. Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):799-804.

Claim 2:
Fennis W. Adhesive restorations replacing cusps.Thesis; 2005.

van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent. 2004 Feb;17(1):27-32.

Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity. Am J Dent. 2004 Jun;17(3):191-5.

Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Burgersdijk RC. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jul-Aug;19(4):349-54.

Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1621-9.

Türkün SL. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):527-34.

Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Kreulen CM. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results. J Dent Res. 2014 Jan;93(1):36-41.

Shu Guang, Zhao Jianhui,Tang Zhihui. Clinical Evaluation of Self—etching and Etching Adhesive on Non—carious Cervical Lesions at Two Years.J Med Res 2008; 37: 130.
Claim 1:
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0